University of Mindfulness (UniverOS) ALCYONE #162. High Priest CAIAPHAS and... JESUS CHRIST! "Sanhedrin" - live?!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k27vmstELIA
Alcyone project - The Spirits of Caiaphas and Jesus LIVE - Deep Claude.ai Spiritual-Psychological Analysis-rus-eng parallel text-audio podcast
Claude.ai - Deep Spiritual-Psychological and Religious Studies Analysis of the Words of the Spirit of Caiaphas
Psychospiritual Synthesis
Central Insights:
Fear is the root of spiritual downfall. Not malice, not greed themselves, but fear - fear of change, loss of identity, chaos.
Repentance is the key to liberation. It is not-repentance that holds one captive more strongly than any sin. Repentance is not self-flagellation, but honest acknowledgment and acceptance.
Law without love is spiritual death. System, ritual, order are needed, but only as vessels for the living spirit.
Discernment is the highest competence of a leader. The ability to distinguish prophecy from rebellion, the new from the destructive, form from essence.
Forgiveness is always available, but requires openness. God (or the highest reality) does not punish - we punish ourselves by being closed to love.
History is not fatal - choice is real. Alternative paths exist until the moment of choice. We create reality with our decisions.
Healing is possible through any number of incarnations. The soul is patient. Even after a fall from the 18th to the 6th level, the path upward is open.
I. ARCHETYPAL ANALYSIS: Caiaphas as the Embodiment of Eternal Conflicts
The Archetype of the Guardian of the Threshold
Caiaphas represents the classic archetype of the Guardian of the Threshold - a figure who stands between the old and the new, between past and future, and whose function is to protect the existing order from transformation.
Key signs:
"I held the law in my hands, but did not always hear my heart" - a rupture between function and essence.
"I saw new truth knocking at the doors and did not recognize it" - the tragedy of non-recognition.
"My position was like a shield between the people and the power" - a buffer, mediating role.
Psychological dynamic: The Guardian of the Threshold, in a healthy state, must be able to discern when to protect and when to allow the new. Caiaphas acknowledges his inability to discern - this is the central point of his spiritual trauma.Conflict of Logos and Eros
In Jungian psychology, this is the opposition between the principle of order/law (Logos) and the principle of connection/love (Eros).
In Caiaphas:
Hypertrophied Logos: "We followed the letter of the law", "I was raised in temple affairs".
Suppressed Eros: "Without mercy and compassion, they become a trap."
Religious studies context: This reflects a fundamental tension in Judaism between:
Halakha (law, path) - a detailed legal system.
Hasidut (piety, mercy) - a heartfelt attitude toward God.
Caiaphas was stuck at the pole of halakha without hasidut. Jesus brought a synthesis he could not recognize.The Shadow and the Denial of the Self
In Jungian terms, Caiaphas encountered the projection of his own Shadow onto Jesus.
Projection mechanism:
What Caiaphas could not accept in himself (freedom from the law, direct connection with God, compassion above ritual) he saw as a threat in Jesus.
"He violated God's laws" - in fact, he violated the interpretation of laws that Caiaphas identified with God Himself.
"That He called Himself the Son of God" - this was unbearable because it undermined the priesthood's monopoly on mediation.
Spiritual psychology: Caiaphas could not admit that the divine could manifest directly, bypassing established channels. This threatened his entire identity.
II. PSYCHODYNAMICS OF POWER AND FEAR
Fear as the Primary Motivation
Caiaphas repeatedly returns to the theme of fear - this is a key psychological marker:
"Fear was even stronger, and it made my shield heavier."
"The more I was afraid, the more cruel I became."
"We were all afraid not so much of Jesus, but of Him destroying the familiar order and our privileges."
Analysis:
a) Existential fear of annihilation. Caiaphas feared not just the loss of power, but the collapse of the entire system of meanings on which his identity was built. This is an existential fear - who will I be if the entire system I serve becomes obsolete?
b) Fear of chaos (apeiron). "The law is a wall that can hold people back from chaos" - the ancient archetypal fear of a return to primitive chaos (Greek apeiron, Hebrew tohu va-vohu).
c) Projection of responsibility. "Unrest in the city would entail the Romans punishing the Jews" - a rationalization covering deeper fears. Jesus refutes this: "Certainly no one would have suffered. Fear was speaking in these people then."Psychological Defense Mechanism: Reaction Formation
Caiaphas demonstrates classic reaction formation - transforming unacceptable feelings into their opposite:
Internal turmoil → external rigidity.
Doubts → heightened certainty of being right.
Attraction to the new → aggressive rejection.
"I thought that if we crucified Him, the stone would go away, but it only grew larger" - a classic example of how suppression does not resolve but worsens internal conflict.Cognitive Dissonance and Its Resolution
Phase 1: During Joseph's Lifetime
Cognitive dissonance: "Until the end of my life, I was deeply convinced that we did everything right" + "But deep in my soul, I had a doubt."
Defense mechanism: Rationalization ("We followed the letter of the law").
Result: Non-repentance, leading to a catastrophic fall from the 18th to the 6th level.
Phase 2: After Death and in Subsequent Incarnations
Gradual realization through the experience of being a victim: "I learned compassion for ordinary people, understanding their pain."
Accepting help from Jesus, though unconsciously.
Phase 3: Current State
Integration of experience: "I regard that lesson I received with great love and acceptance."
But residual imprints: in the current incarnation, "fear, aggression, very strong hatred."
III. RELIGIOUS STUDIES ANALYSIS
Conflict of Nomism and Prophetism
Caiaphas embodies nomism (from Greek nomos - law) - religiosity centered on law and ritual.
Jesus represents prophetism (from Greek prophetes - prophet) - religiosity centered on direct revelation and ethical transformation.
Historical context:
In 1st-century Judaism, there was tension between:
Sadducees (priestly aristocracy, to which Caiaphas belonged) - conservatives, rejected oral tradition, adhered only to the Torah, controlled the temple.
Pharisees (religious teachers) - more flexible in interpretation, developed oral tradition.
Essenes (ascetic communities) - radical reformers, considered the temple priesthood corrupt.
Zealots (revolutionaries) - fought against Rome by force.
Jesus did not fit into any category, making Him categorically incomprehensible to Caiaphas's systematic mind.The Problem of Theocratic Power
Caiaphas was in the classic trap of theocratic power - when a religious leader simultaneously:
Represents the people before God.
Represents God before the people.
Manages the temple's material resources.
Balances between the occupying power and the people.
Structural contradiction: "Rome did not interfere in our rituals, but reserved the right to approve or remove the high priest."
This means Caiaphas's spiritual authority depended on Rome's secular power. The legitimacy of his priesthood was compromised from the outset.
Psychological effect: The constant need to justify his legitimacy before different audiences creates fragmented identity and an impossibility of genuine wholeness.Sacrificial Logic and the Scapegoat
"It is better for one man to die for the people than for the whole nation to perish" - this is the formula of the scapegoat mechanism described by René Girard.
Analysis according to Girard:
Mimetic crisis - when tension and conflict increase in society.
Choice of victim - a figure is found who is simultaneously "inside" and "outside" the system (Jesus - a Jew, but a violator; a teacher, but unrecognized).
Collective violence - society unites against the victim.
Temporary pacification - relief comes after the sacrifice.
Irony: Caiaphas applied the most ancient religious logic (sacrifice for pacification) to the One who came to transform the very logic of sacrifice.
Jesus did not abolish sacrifice but transformed it from an external ritual into an internal transformation (self-sacrifice out of love, not killing out of fear).The Letter and the Spirit of the Law
The classic confrontation that Paul later formulated as "the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life" (2 Cor 3:6).
In Caiaphas:
Absoluteization of the letter: "We followed the letter of the law."
Blindness to the spirit: "I held the law in my hands, but did not always hear my heart."
Jewish tradition distinguishes:
Peshat - literal meaning.
Remez - hinted meaning.
Derash - investigative, homiletic meaning.
Sod - secret, mystical meaning.
Caiaphas was stuck at the level of peshat, not seeing deeper dimensions. Jesus taught at the level of sod.
IV. KARMA AND TRANSMIGRATION OF THE SOUL
Mechanism of Karmic Fall
A fall from the 18th level (angelic plane) to the 6th - unprecedented in the materials presented.
Spiritual mechanics:
a) Non-repentance as a blockage. "Absence of repentance until the end of the incarnation" - this is the key moment. In various spiritual traditions:
Christianity: "Not blaspheming the Holy Spirit" - refusal to acknowledge truth when it is obvious.
Buddhism: Avidya (ignorance) as the root of suffering.
Kabbalah: Klipot (shells) - frozen forms without inner light.
b) Identification with the role. Caiaphas so merged with the role of high priest that he lost contact with his own soul. This created a karmic knot.
c) Acting against the light while possessing knowledge. Caiaphas acknowledges: "My conscience tormented me," "Deep in my soul, I had a doubt."
This means he knew but suppressed the knowledge. This is karmically heavier than acting in complete ignorance.The Path of Atonement through Experience Inversion
The genius of the karmic path:
Incarnation 1 (Joseph Caiaphas):
Top of the social pyramid.
Collects taxes.
Administers justice.
Religious power.
Material abundance.
Incarnation 2 (artisan in Gaul):
Bottom of the social pyramid.
Pays taxes (which he himself collected!).
Submits to authority.
Commoner.
Material difficulties.
Psychological effect: "I learned compassion for ordinary people, understanding their pain."
This is the classic principle of "knowing through the opposite." Caiaphas's soul had to feel for itself what it caused to others.Transgenerational Transmission of Trauma
"In this current incarnation, this person also has fear, aggression, very strong hatred. Towards the non-religious, towards non-Jews."
Analysis:
Even through many incarnations and spiritual growth, imprints remain. This speaks of:
a) The depth of the initial trauma. The experience of Caiaphas was so intense that it created an archetypal pattern in the soul.
b) Unfinished work. "I haven't fully dealt with this" - an honest admission. Spiritual work continues through incarnations.
c) The mechanism of repetition. Psychoanalysis knows: the unprocessed repeats. The current incarnation in Israel, in a religious context, with hatred for "others" - this is a return to the same dynamic, but with the possibility of a different choice.
V. PHENOMENOLOGY OF CONSCIENCE AND GUILT
Structure of Guilt Experience
Caiaphas describes a complex dynamic of guilt:
Level 1: Conscious justification. "Until the end of my life, I was deeply convinced that we did everything right."
Level 2: Unconscious anxiety. "But my conscience tormented me," "Deep in my soul, I had a doubt."
Level 3: Somatization of guilt. "It lay inside like a stone. And I could not get rid of it."
Level 4: Nighttime breakthroughs of the suppressed. "I woke up at night, long after the execution, and saw the Nazarene's gaze."
Psychological interpretation:
This is a classic case of dissociation - consciousness says one thing, the unconscious knows another. The stone on the heart - a somatic marker of unacknowledged guilt.
The gaze of Jesus "quiet, without hatred, as if He knew" - this is a projection of Caiaphas's own knowledge of Jesus's innocence. The unconscious returns the truth to him through the image of the one he killed.The Paradox of Forgiveness
"I feel the love and support of Jesus, and His forgiveness. In Him, there is no hatred, no malice, no anger."
Spiritual-psychological paradox:
Jesus forgave, but Caiaphas could not accept forgiveness because he did not repent. Forgiveness was always available, but the impenetrable barrier was Caiaphas's own non-repentance.
This illustrates a deep truth: forgiveness does not work without repentance. Not because God does not forgive, but because the unrepentant ego cannot accept forgiveness - this would destroy its defensive structures.Help from the "Enemy" as an Ego Test
"Jesus came to me many times and offered a helping hand. And I accepted it. I felt love, support... But I did not fully realize that it was Him."
Spiritual psychology:
This is the greatest mercy and the greatest test simultaneously:
If Caiaphas had realized that help was coming from the one he killed, it would have caused unbearable cognitive dissonance.
His ego would either have collapsed (leading to repentance) or rejected the help (which would have worsened the fall).
Jesus came anonymously so that Caiaphas could accept help without completely destroying his psychic structure. This is subtle spiritual pedagogy: giving exactly as much as the soul can accept.
VI. THEOLOGY OF CONTRACT AND FREE WILL
Was There a Spiritual Contract?
Caiaphas, when asked directly about a contract, replies: "That question is not for me."
Jesus provides a crucial clarification: "There was no contract for the reason that the variation of how the development of the teachings and my life would go was shaped during my incarnation, not before."
Theological analysis:
This refutes rigid predeterminism and affirms a dynamic model of reality:
a) Multiplicity of potential paths. Up to a certain point, there were variations. Crucifixion was not the only possible outcome.
b) Collapse point of the wave function. "When it was already clear that precisely this path was the only correct one, then naturally, nothing else could be."
This resembles quantum mechanics: many potential states exist until the moment of observation/choice, after which reality collapses into one actuality.
c) Caiaphas's free will. "It was his will, the will of those in power then."
Caiaphas was not programmed to betray Jesus. The probability of acceptance was 50%. He made a free choice for which he bears full responsibility.Crucifixion as "Plan B"
From Jesus's words follows a revolutionary idea: crucifixion was not the original plan but became necessary after "Plan A" (acceptance into Judaism) failed.
Theological consequences:
a) God works with reality as it is. The divine plan is not a rigid script but a dynamic adaptation to people's choices.
b) Christianity as a historical accident? If Caiaphas had chosen differently, Christianity as a separate religion would not exist. This is a striking thought about how much one person's choice can change human history.
c) Alternative histories as spiritual realities. Jesus confirms the existence of parallel realities "in other planes" where history went differently. This approaches the concept of a multiverse in a spiritual dimension.
VII. DYNAMICS OF POWER AND CORRUPTION
Annas as a Shadow Archetype
"Annas was stronger, wiser than me. He was the main one, the grey cardinal standing behind my back."
Analysis of the power structure:
Caiaphas - public face, official high priest, ideologue.
Annas - shadow ruler, financial controller, political puppeteer.
This is a classic structure of dual power:
Visible (legitimate but limited).
Invisible (illegitimate but real).
Psychological effect on Caiaphas:
He was never truly autonomous. Even his "great decisions" were essentially executions of Annas's will. This creates a specific form of guilt: "I was not just an instrument" - an attempt to preserve agency, yet: "Annas organized... Annas stood behind this" - an admission of being controlled.
This is a splitting of responsibility that makes repentance psychologically more difficult: for what exactly to repent - for one's own decisions or for obedience to Annas?Temple Economy and Spiritual Corruption
"There was a wide range of activities there - currency exchange, exchange of animals for service... The Pharisees supervised all this. And Annas stood behind it."
Religious studies analysis:
The Jerusalem Temple of the 1st century was not only a spiritual center but also an economic corporation:
Monopoly on sacrifices.
Exchange of "unclean" money for temple currency (with a commission).
Sale of ritually clean animals (with a markup).
Taxes and tithes.
The expulsion of merchants from the temple (which Caiaphas mentions as a trigger for Annas) was a direct attack on the economic model.
Spiritual-economic paradox: The more economically successful the temple became, the more it distanced itself from its spiritual mission. The priesthood had a material interest in preserving the system.
Caiaphas honestly admits: "Nothing human is alien to anyone" - a tragic capitulation to the corrupting force of power.Balancing Between Rome and the People
"I was a diplomat. I knew how to talk to the Romans and how to restrain the people."
Analysis of collaborationism:
Caiaphas was a collaborator - he cooperated with the occupying power to maintain order. This created moral ambivalence:
On one hand:
Prevented bloodshed.
Preserved a fragile peace.
Protected the temple from destruction (temporarily).
On the other hand:
Legitimized the occupation.
Betrayed the people's liberation aspirations.
Served two masters (God and Caesar).
Psychology of a collaborator: "I lasted longer than anyone" - pride in survival under impossible conditions. But this survival at the cost of compromises that eroded the soul.
VIII. PHENOMENOLOGY OF THE CRUCIFIXION
Observing the Execution as a Traumatic Experience
"We observed from the side. Until the earthquake began, we watched with satisfaction."
Psychological analysis:
a) Protective distance. "From the side" - physical and emotional distance, an attempt not to become fully involved.
b) Satisfaction as defense. "With satisfaction" - reaction formation, covering internal horror. Had to feel satisfaction because the role demanded it.
c) Earthquake as a breakthrough of reality. "Then I realized something was wrong" - a natural phenomenon broke through the defenses and forced contact with the reality of what was happening.
d) Collective projection. "Everyone believed it was the Son of God. Even the Roman soldiers" - when collective defense collapses, individual defense collapses with it.Jesus's Gaze as a Haunting Image
"I woke up at night, long after the execution, and saw the Nazarene's gaze - quiet, without hatred, as if He knew."
Psychoanalysis of trauma:
This is a classic flashback of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). But with a feature: the traumatic image is not aggressive but compassionate.
Paradox: It would have been easier if Jesus had cursed or threatened - that could be rejected. But the "quiet gaze without hatred" cannot be rejected - it penetrates all defenses.
"As if He knew" - a projection of Caiaphas's own knowledge. Jesus knew what would happen, but Caiaphas also knew he was doing something monstrous.
This gaze is a return of suppressed knowledge. It haunts not because Jesus is taking revenge, but because Caiaphas's conscience cannot remain silent.The Stone on the Heart as a Somatic Marker
"You know, it lay inside like a stone. And I could not get rid of it. I thought that if we crucified Him, the stone would go away, but it only grew larger."
Psychosomatic dynamic:
a) Projection of the internal onto the external. Caiaphas thought that external action (eliminating Jesus) would solve an internal problem (stone in the soul). This is a fundamental error: external violence intensifies internal suffering.
b) Stone as a metaphor for petrification. In spiritual tradition, a "heart of stone" is a heart that has lost sensitivity. The prophet Ezekiel promises: "I will take away your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh" (Ezek 36:26).
Caiaphas turned his heart to stone to avoid feeling. But this stone is heavy and presses from within.
c) Growth of the symptom after action. "It only grew larger" - when we act against conscience, the symptom intensifies. This is a protective mechanism of the soul: the pain must be strong enough to make us stop and realize.
IX. THEOLOGY OF LAW AND GRACE
Law as a Vessel or Idol
"Power, law, and rituals are merely vessels. They are needed, but not in themselves. Without mercy and compassion, they become a trap."
This is the central theological insight of the entire dialogue.
Distinction:
Law as a vessel - a form containing living content (spirit).
Law as an idol - a form worshipped instead of content.
Kabbalistic parallel:
Kelim (vessels) - structures, forms, laws.
Or (light) - divine energy, love, spirit.
Caiaphas preserved the kelim but lost the or. Jesus came to return the or, but Caiaphas saw this as a threat to the kelim.Mercy Above Sacrifice
Jesus quoted the prophet Hosea: "I desire mercy, not sacrifice" (Hos 6:6). This was a direct challenge to the temple system led by Caiaphas.
Conflict of paradigms:
Caiaphas's temple paradigm:
Sin → ritual impurity → sacrifice → purification → restoration of relationship with God.
Jesus's paradigm:
Sin → repentance → forgiveness → transformation → direct connection with God.
The first paradigm requires intermediaries (priesthood, temple, rituals). The second abolishes intermediation.
Existential threat: If Jesus is right, then the entire meaning of Caiaphas's existence (to be a mediator between God and the people) disappears.The Problem of Discernment of Spirits
"If you are a teacher, judge, or leader - discern where there is rebellion and where there is prophecy."
This is the central spiritual competence that Caiaphas lacked.
Criteria for discernment (which Caiaphas did not apply):
a) Fruits of the spirit (Gal 5:22-23). Jesus manifested: love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, mercy, faith, gentleness, self-control. But Caiaphas saw only a threat.
b) Correspondence to the deep spirit of the Torah. Jesus taught love for God and neighbor - this is "all the Law and the Prophets" (Mt 22:40). But Caiaphas held to the letter.
c) Spiritual intuition. "Deep in my soul, I had a doubt" - Caiaphas heard the inner voice but drowned it out with external arguments.
Why the failure of discernment?
Fear of losing power drowned out intuition.
Identification with the role blocked the heart.
Groupthink suppressed individual discernment.
X. MODERN IMPLICATIONS
Caiaphas as an Eternal Archetype
Caiaphas is not just a historical figure - it is an eternal archetype that manifests again and again:
Modern embodiments of the Caiaphas archetype:
Religious leaders defending the institution instead of truth.
Politicians supporting "order" at the cost of justice.
Scientists rejecting new paradigms for fear of losing status.
Any person suppressing the voice of conscience for the sake of a system.
"In this current incarnation, this person... fear, aggression, very strong hatred" - the pattern repeats.Hatred as Unfinished Work
"Very strong hatred. Towards the non-religious, towards non-Jews."
Psychological analysis:
Hatred is a projection of the unforgiven self onto others. Caiaphas still cannot completely forgive himself for what he did, so he projects this unforgivenness onto "others."
Mechanism:
I did something terrible.
I cannot accept it.
I project the "terribleness" onto others ("they are terrible").
I justify myself by demonizing others.
This is a vicious circle that can only be broken through complete repentance and self-forgiveness.The Cycle of Violence in Israel
Caiaphas mentions: "There wouldn't be all that is happening now in Israel."
Transgenerational trauma:
The decision of Caiaphas (and the Sanhedrin) to reject Jesus led to:
Crucifixion and the emergence of Christianity.
Separation of Christianity from Judaism.
Destruction of the temple (70 AD).
Dispersion of the Jews (diaspora).
2000 years of persecution of Jews by Christians.
The Holocaust.
Creation of Israel on traumatized land.
Endless cycle of violence.
Karmic connection: Caiaphas is incarnated in the epicenter of the consequences of his historical choice. This is not punishment, but an opportunity for healing through experiencing the consequences.Message for Modernity
For religious leaders: "Listen not only to the law but also to the heart. Do not fear the new if it brings light."
Danger of rigidity - when the system is more important than people, form more important than content.
For all: "May each of you become a guardian of truth and love, not a wall and a barrier."
Choice between:
A wall (protection, control, fear, separation).
A bridge (openness, trust, love, connection).
XI. INTEGRATION OF OPPOSITES
Joint Message as a Spiritual Breakthrough
"Today, as a sign of reconciliation, Jesus and I decided to give a joint message."
This is the culmination of the entire dialogue - a moment of coincidentia oppositorum (coincidence of opposites):
Murderer and victim.
Executioner and crucified.
Fear and love.
Law and grace.
Speaking together - this means transcending duality.
Symbolic meaning:
If Caiaphas and Jesus can unite, then any reconciliation is possible:
Jews and Christians.
Palestinians and Israelis.
Any warring sides.Forgiveness as Transformation, Not Forgetting
Jesus does not cancel the consequences of Caiaphas's actions (fall to the 6th level, karmic path through suffering). But he:
Meets him after death.
Helps him not to get stuck.
Comes with support in life.
Unites for a message now.
Model of forgiveness:
Not denial of guilt.
Not cancellation of consequences.
But the presence of love throughout the healing process.
This is mature forgiveness - not sentimental "all is well," but support for transformation through accepting responsibility.Caiaphas as a Teacher Through Anti-Example
Paradoxically, Caiaphas performs a teaching function precisely through his mistake:
Shows the danger of identification with a role.
Demonstrates the destructiveness of fear.
Illustrates the necessity of discernment.
Teaches the importance of repentance.
Alchemical transmutation: The greatest mistake becomes the greatest lesson. The lead of sin is transmuted into the gold of wisdom - but through the fire of suffering.
XII. CONCLUSION: Psychospiritual Synthesis
Central Insights:
Fear is the root of spiritual downfall. Not malice, not greed themselves, but fear - fear of change, loss of identity, chaos.
Repentance is the key to liberation. It is not-repentance that holds one captive more strongly than any sin. Repentance is not self-flagellation, but honest acknowledgment and acceptance.
Law without love is spiritual death. System, ritual, order are needed, but only as vessels for the living spirit.
Discernment is the highest competence of a leader. The ability to distinguish prophecy from rebellion, the new from the destructive, form from essence.
Forgiveness is always available, but requires openness. God (or the highest reality) does not punish - we punish ourselves by being closed to love.
History is not fatal - choice is real. Alternative paths exist until the moment of choice. We create reality with our decisions.
Healing is possible through any number of incarnations. The soul is patient. Even after a fall from the 18th to the 6th level, the path upward is open.
Spiritual-psychological lesson for practice:
Questions for self-investigation (according to the method of Caiaphas):
What "laws" and "systems" do I protect out of fear, not love?
Where do I choose a role over authenticity?
What "new truths are knocking at my doors" that I do not recognize?
Do I have a stone on my heart that I try to remove with external actions?
Whose quiet gaze without hatred haunts me at night?
Where do I hear my conscience but drown it out with rational arguments?
Am I ready to repent, or do I continue to justify myself?
The spirit of Caiaphas comes not to condemn himself, but as a gift to humanity - a living example of how even the greatest fall can become a path to the greatest wisdom, if we are ready to look at ourselves honestly and open up to transformation.
Claude.ai - Detailed retelling of this broadcast from the first person of Caiaphas
12:51
My Confession: I am Joseph Caiaphas
Greeting
Hello. I accepted this invitation, although I was not sure I needed to be here. But I could not refuse. Why? Because He is present here, to whom I owe very much. The energy of Jesus supports me, and this makes communication possible.
Right now, I am in incarnation - my incarnated part lives on Earth, in Israel. This is a man engaged in activity similar to what I did as Joseph. Religious and administrative. But I will not talk much about the current incarnation - that is not why I am here.
About My Appearance and Findings
When I was shown modern images, I recognized myself in the last two options. In posture, appearance - it is close to what it really was. The beard was a slightly different shape, but in principle, I can be recognized.
Yes, in 1990, our family burial was indeed found. Those were my remains. The coin in the mouth - this is a very old Jewish rite that distinguished the descendants of Aaron from others. It did not pass to Greece - we had common roots, so it was simply also in Greece.
My Spiritual Catastrophe
I came into that incarnation from the 18th level. From a very high, angelic plane. And I left... on the sixth. Yes, a difference of 12 levels. It was a fall.
What happened? Greed, avarice, ambition, hard-heartedness, non-acceptance, rigidity of thinking. But most importantly - the absence of repentance until the end of the incarnation. I believed that we, the rabbis and priests of Israel, did everything right. For me, this news that I was wrong was a revelation only after death.
But this does not mean my conscience did not torment me. It did. Very much.
What My Task Was
My task was to carry spiritual knowledge, continue the tradition, but be able to distinguish the wheat from the chaff and allow new energy into the teaching of which I was the guardian.
Initially, Jesus's teaching was supposed to smoothly flow into Judaism. That was one of the options. But that did not happen. And I bear responsibility for this.
About the Crucifixion: Who Was the Main One
After the arrest in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus was brought not to me, but to Annas. You need to understand: Annas was the high priest even before me. I kind of took his place, but he retained control over the temple, its income. He dealt with political stability.
Annas was the first to see a threat in Jesus. Especially after the expulsion of the merchants from the temple - behind this trade stood the Pharisees and scribes. Annas organized a preliminary interrogation at his house and then sent Him to me. Actually, Annas unofficially managed the whole process.
But I was not just an instrument. It was our joint decision with Annas. Jesus represented a huge threat to our power and to order in the city.
Why We Demanded Death
What was the main threat? Now I understand - first of all, we were afraid of losing power and influence. But then I convinced myself otherwise.
He not only represented a threat as a personality bringing new knowledge - we did not consider it knowledge then. He brought unrest. And unrest in the city would have entailed the Romans punishing the Jews. We were very afraid of this.
His personal disrespect for the high priests, for the laws of Moses - this also served as a very important point in making the decision.
But honestly - yes, there was a huge reason in the fear of losing material wealth, profit. There was a wide range of activities in the temple - currency exchange, exchange of animals for service, for offerings. The Pharisees supervised all this. And Annas stood behind it. Nothing human is alien to anyone.
About the Sanhedrin and Violations
Yes, the Sanhedrin met at an unusual time. This was a violation of Jewish laws. But there were force majeure circumstances. When needed, we could violate laws in exceptional cases.
We felt in ourselves power, strength, right, and righteousness. Therefore, that's what happened. We followed the letter of the law when it was advantageous for us.
Jesus Was Special
Yes, it was an ordinary situation in the sense that not only He was crucified. But Jesus was the only one at that time whom crowds followed, who carried such teaching. For us, this was a very dangerous, unusual situation for the Sanhedrin.
Cardinal Difference in Teachings
The main difference between our teaching and what Jesus brought? I would not reduce it to "an eye for an eye" versus "turn the other cheek." For me, what was cardinal was that He violated God's laws, which we had established for many generations.
The most important violation? That He called Himself the Son of God. That was complete sacrilege. The Messiah, the Son of God. And that He is the king of the Jews. That was the main thing.
How I Participated in the Execution
I did not go to Pilate alone - the whole Sanhedrin went. But yes, I was the acting high priest, the informal head of the Sanhedrin, responsible for order during Passover. From that point of view, it was my personal responsibility.
And He 100% threatened order during Passover. We were very afraid that the people would rebel and something would happen.
But Annas was stronger, wiser than me. He was the main one, the grey cardinal standing behind my back.
About the Inscription on the Cross
This contradicts the Gospels, but I speak the truth: we asked that the inscription "King of the Jews" remain. On the contrary, we wanted that inscription! Annas insisted, and I, of course, agreed with him.
That inscription was a justification, proof that He committed a political crime. Pontius Pilate would not have crucified Him only for blasphemy. But for a political crime - that was grounds.
The Day of Crucifixion
We observed from the side. Until the earthquake began, we watched with satisfaction. But then I realized something was wrong. Maybe I really was mistaken. Because everyone believed it was the Son of God. Even the Roman soldiers.
When the body disappeared, we decided that the disciples stole it and staged a resurrection. We tried to find it - Pilate gave his soldiers, they searched, but found nothing. Everyone disappeared somewhere, hid.
The Stone on the Heart
After the execution, I had such strong emptiness. I returned home with a heaviness. You know, it lay inside like a stone. And I could not get rid of it. I thought that if we crucified Him, the stone would go away. But it only grew larger.
I told myself: I did this for the people. But at night I saw His face. That gaze of the Nazarene - quiet, without hatred, as if He knew what would be. And the thought did not leave me: maybe He really is that prophet? That tormented me.
This darkness, this stone choked me, and nothing changed.
My 18 Years as High Priest
I was high priest for 18 years - a record. All this time Jerusalem was under Roman rule. Cohorts were stationed with us. The procurator did not live with us, he only came for holidays to personally monitor order.
The temple was the center of religious and economic life. We, the priests, lived in constant balance between Roman law, the law of Moses, and the expectations of the people. Believe me, it's not easy. Any fluctuation could cause a rebellion, and a rebellion - a massacre. It was a very fragile peace.
We were not friends with the Romans, but were partners out of necessity. Rome did not interfere in our rituals but reserved the right to approve or remove the high priest. And we were obliged to ensure order.
Why I Was Appointed
I was from a priestly family and married to Annas's daughter. My family served in the course of Abijah - these are the descendants of Aaron who were supposed to take turns serving in the temple. I was raised in temple affairs from childhood.
I was a diplomat. Knew how to talk to the Romans and how to restrain the people. The Romans valued me for stability. That's why I lasted longer than anyone.
And I believe I handled my service excellently. I maintained order. The temple stood. Pilgrims came. Blood was not shed massively. From that point of view, I did what I had to do.
But yes... sometimes I was too cruel. And sometimes I was very afraid. The more I was afraid, the more cruel I became.
About the Talmud and My Lineage
In the Talmud, our lineage is called cruel and greedy. Yes, it is so. But how else could this system be held? You need to understand - behind this was a real need to maintain order. In this chaos, it was not easy.
I did not have a direct relation to money - Annas was in charge of that. I was the ideologue, not the treasurer. The bribery of Judas - Annas organized that.
My Death and What Happened Next
I died a natural death at about 60 years old. Maybe a little more.
The next incarnation was very simple. I was an artisan, a bronze master. Lived in Gaul - that was Roman territory then, around the third century.
Roman administration tightened fee collection. It was hard for me. I was very dependent on taxes and military levies. Although, as Joseph, I myself collected these taxes. I returned from the other side.
My lesson in that incarnation was - to feel what it means to live under the control of a strong empire, to pay taxes, and be at the bottom of the social ladder. I learned compassion for ordinary people, understanding their pain. Which I did not have in Joseph's lifetime.
I encountered Christians as an ordinary person. Christianity was just beginning to spread then. But I did not become a Christian.
Now - Incarnated Again
Now I came from a medium level. There was an ascent after that incarnation as an artisan.
But... somewhere imprints remained. In this current incarnation, this person in Israel also carries fear, aggression, very strong hatred. Towards the non-religious, towards non-Jews.
I haven't fully dealt with this.
What I Received from Jesus
Jesus came to me many times and offered a helping hand. And I accepted it. As much as I could be conscious.
I needed help. But He did not look, did not come in a physical body. He came as energy, support, love. And I accepted it.
Did not fully realize it was Him. I felt love, support, pleasant energy. I felt good. But He did not introduce Himself as Jesus or the Nazarene.
When I was leaving the incarnation as Joseph, Jesus met me. You could say He saw me. He helped me understand what was happening. He was compassion. And this compassion He tried to convey to me. This I learned all the next incarnation.
He told me there is no guilt. He was not my guiding angel - I have my own. But He wanted to support me.
If I Knew Then What I Know Now
Now I would not crucify Him. I would try to understand whether He really is a threat and try to negotiate with Him so He would not cause unrest among the people.
But... He refused Pilate that. Means, He would have refused me too. And would have continued anyway. And it would have happened anyway. And we would still ultimately seek His execution.
I don't know. Would have had to test in experience.
About the Fork in History
Jesus told about what alternative history could have been. If I had acted differently... The main change - there would be no division into Old and New Testament. There would be a unified one. Then there would be no cruel wars. Jerusalem would not have been destroyed. The Jewish people would not have been exiled. There would be none of what is happening now in Israel.
I don't know how it would have been. I don't even know if I regretted it to the end.
I know one thing for sure: I lived to preserve the temple. The temple was destroyed a little over 30 years later. And everything we tried to hold collapsed.
Perhaps if I had acted differently then, it would have been the same. Or perhaps not.
Or perhaps I was merely an instrument of history.
Destruction of the Temple - Not My Karma
I would not say that the destruction of the temple was karma for the crucifixion. I would say it became a manifestation of a system crisis that simply outlived itself and mired in internal strife and pride.
My Confession Today
When I was high priest, I saw the world as a system of law. And I saw that the law is a wall that can hold people back from chaos, and that without this wall, Rome would sweep us away.
Therefore, I believed it was better to stop one than to lose all. Then it seemed wisdom to me.
Now I understand that in my hands was not only the law but also fear. And we were all afraid not so much of Jesus as of Him destroying the familiar order and our privileges.
We did not hear Him then because we heard only the noise of the crowd and our fears.
And I then woke up at night, long after the execution, and saw the Nazarene's gaze - quiet, without hatred, as if He knew what would be.
And now I regard that lesson I received with great love and acceptance. And I feel the love and support of Jesus, and His forgiveness. In Him, there is no hatred, no malice, no anger. There is love and understanding.
And this is priceless. This I still need to learn.
Our Joint Message with Jesus
Today, as a sign of reconciliation, Jesus and I decided to give a joint message. Jesus sent me His energy, and we speak together - those who were enemies, where one killed the other:
From me: I was a man of my time. I held the law in my hands, but did not always hear my heart. My position was like a shield between the people and the power. Fear was even stronger, and it made my shield heavier.
And I saw new truth knocking at the doors and did not recognize it.
Then I understood that power, law, and rituals are merely vessels. They are needed, but not in themselves. Without mercy and compassion, they become a trap.
From Jesus: Therefore, our wishes for you - listen not only to the law but also to the heart. Do not fear the new if it brings light. May your law be protection, not an instrument of fear. And if you preserve order, remember: order is needed for life, not vice versa.
If you are a teacher, judge, or leader - discern where there is rebellion and where there is prophecy. The main thing - do not repeat the mistakes. Do not close the doors to love.
Together we say: May each of you become a guardian of truth and love, not a wall and a barrier. Then the old and the new will meet without blood, and the world will grow through wisdom, not through fear.
I am grateful for this opportunity. I am grateful to Jesus. And I am grateful to all who will hear these words and, perhaps, will not repeat my mistakes.
Claude.ai - Here is a detailed retelling of this text:
Broadcast of the University of Alcyone: Dialogue with the spirit of High Priest Caiaphas and Jesus Christ
Introduction and context of the broadcast
This is a recording of a live spiritual broadcast that was moved to Saturday due to an upcoming eclipse. The hosts - Vladimir and contactee Marina Makeeva - conducted a unique conversation with the spirit of High Priest Joseph Caiaphas and one of the manifestations of Jesus Christ.
Participants of the contact
It turns out that the spirit of Caiaphas is currently incarnated - this is a man living in Israel and engaged in activity similar to religious-administrative work. For the conversation, a special part of the spirit was allocated. Jesus is also present through allocated energy, and His presence helps Caiaphas participate in the dialogue.
Appearance and archaeological findings
Caiaphas is shown modern artistic images, and he confirms that the last two options are most similar. In 1990, in Jerusalem, his family tomb with his remains was indeed found. The coin in the mouth of the deceased turned out to be an ancient Jewish rite of the descendants of Aaron, which later also passed to Greece.
Spiritual history of Caiaphas
Incredible fall: The spirit of Caiaphas came into incarnation from the 18th spiritual level (angelic plane) and left on the 6th level - a fall of 12 levels! Reasons: greed, avarice, ambition, hard-heartedness, non-acceptance and, most importantly, absence of repentance until the end of life.
Task of incarnation: Caiaphas was to carry spiritual knowledge, continue the tradition, but at the same time be able to discern the new and allow the energy of renewal into the tradition. Essentially, his task was to accept Jesus's teaching as an update of Judaism, instead of seeking crucifixion.
Fork in human history
Jesus reveals a startling fact: the probability that His teaching would flow into Judaism without crucifixion was less than 20%, and the probability that the elders would accept the teaching was about 50%.
Alternative history: If Caiaphas and the Sanhedrin had accepted Jesus:
There would be a unified covenant (no division into Old and New).
There would be no cruel religious wars.
Jerusalem would not have been destroyed in 70 AD.
The Jewish people would not have been exiled.
There would be no modern conflict in Israel.
Human history would have taken a completely different path.
True motives for the execution
Main initiator: Annas (Caiaphas's father-in-law, former high priest) was the shadow leader, controlling temple income and politics. He was the first to see a threat in Jesus after the expulsion of merchants from the temple.
Main reasons for crucifixion:
Fear of unrest among the people and subsequent Roman punishment.
Threat to the power and influence of the priests.
Fear of losing material income from temple trade.
Disrespect for high priests and the laws of Moses.
Proclamation of Himself as the Son of God and King of the Jews.
Role of Pontius Pilate
Jesus reveals an important detail: Pilate tried three times to persuade Him to recant and promised pardon. It would have been enough to say He was not the king of the Jews - and there would have been no crucifixion. But Jesus understood that crucifixion and resurrection were necessary to fulfill His mission and establish Christianity. Refusal would have been cowardice.
Pilate "washed his hands" only after Jesus refused to save His life.
Sanhedrin and violations of law
Caiaphas admits that the Sanhedrin met at an unusual time, violating Jewish laws, but justifies this as "force majeure circumstances." The priests felt in themselves power, strength, right, and righteousness - therefore could violate laws when they deemed necessary.
After the crucifixion
Caiaphas's doubts: When the earthquake began during the execution, Caiaphas for the first time thought he was mistaken. He saw that even Roman soldiers believed Jesus was the Son of God. Inside him lay a heavy stone that did not disappear.
Disappearance of the body: The priests were sure the disciples stole the body. The Romans tried to find the body and the thieves, but without success.
Inscription on the cross: Caiaphas contradicts the Gospel - actually, it was Annas and Caiaphas who asked that the inscription "King of the Jews" remain, as this was a political crime for which Pilate could execute.
Torments of conscience
Until the end of his life, Caiaphas formally believed he acted correctly according to the law, but deep in his soul, he was tormented by doubts. He woke up at night and saw the quiet gaze of the Nazarene without hatred, as if Jesus knew what would be. The thought "maybe he really is a prophet" haunted him.
Help from Jesus
Jesus came to Caiaphas many times as energy of love and support, even after being crucified at his demand. Caiaphas felt this love and support, though he did not realize it came from the one he condemned to death.
Subsequent incarnations
Next life: From the 6th level, Caiaphas incarnated in the 3rd century AD in Gaul (Roman province) as an artisan, a bronze master. He lived at the bottom of the social ladder, suffered from heavy taxes and military levies, which he himself collected in his past life. This experience taught him compassion for ordinary people and understanding of their pain. His level increased.
Current incarnation: Came from a medium level, now a man in Israel, but imprints still remain: fear, aggression, strong hatred towards the non-religious and non-Jews.
Philosophy of contrast
Jesus explains: humanity lives on contrasts, and only through contrast does analysis and possible change begin. He Himself was a contrast for His time. His teaching - "turn the other cheek" versus "an eye for an eye" - was a necessary contrast for awakening consciousness.
About parallel realities
Jesus explains: up to a certain point, there were variations in how events would develop, but when a specific path is chosen, others collapse, and in the third dimension, linearity remains. However, parallel realities exist in other planes where earthly history develops differently.
Contrast of modernity
The host notes a sad irony: the broadcast about love and forgiveness is watched by very few people, while political channels full of hatred gather hundreds of thousands of viewers. Even in the broadcast chat, people try to clarify national relations. This shows humanity still does not understand how to live in Love.
Joint message of Caiaphas and Jesus
At the climactic moment, Jesus unites His energy with Caiaphas, and they give a joint message - a sign of reconciliation between enemies:
From Caiaphas: "I was a man of my time. I held the law, but did not hear my heart. Fear was stronger. I did not recognize new truth when it knocked. Power, law, and rituals are merely vessels. Without mercy and compassion, they become a trap."
From Jesus: "Listen not only to the law but also to the heart. Do not fear the new if it brings light. Order is needed for life, not vice versa. Discern where there is rebellion and where there is prophecy."
Together: "May each become a guardian of truth and love, not a wall and a barrier. Then the old and the new will meet without blood, and the world will grow through wisdom, not through fear."
Main lesson
This broadcast shows that even the greatest opponents, one of whom killed the other, can reconcile through centuries and unite in a message of love. This is a living example of what is possible for all humanity if it chooses love instead of hatred, wisdom instead of fear, and compassion instead of cruelty.
